Daniel Cox vs Herkko Pollanen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cox vs Pollanen analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Cox vs Herkko Pollanen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Cox 1 - 0 Pollanen
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cox has won 48.84% of points on his second serve, while Pollanen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cox, in recent form, has won 53.55% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pollanen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.21% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cox has saved 47.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pollanen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cox has won 57.41% of matches played (W/L 31/ 23), with Pollanen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cox has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 235/ 117), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 26/ 30). Pollanen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 13/ 9), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 7/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Cox has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 22/ 12), where as Pollanen has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cox winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cox winning 2 and Pollanen winning 0. The last match between Cox and Pollanen was at the Champaign Challenger, 13-11-2016, Q2 round, I.hard with Daniel Cox getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:35.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cox and Pollanen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cox winning 0 times and Pollanen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cox winning 0, and Pollanen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cox has played against opponents with an average rank of 189.61 while Pollanen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cox has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pollanen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cox has converted 38.06% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pollanen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
16
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
16
Minor
560
Rank
206
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
711
High
29
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
61% (436-284)
Career Total W/L
47% (55-63)
67% (12-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$37,845
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Daniel Cox | Herkko Pollanen |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 10 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:11:35 | 1:11:35 |
1st Serve % | 47% (28/60) | 61% (31/51) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (20/28) | 61% (19/31) |
2nd Serve Win% | 72% (23/32) | 55% (11/20) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 20% (1/5) |
Return Points W% | 41% (21/51) | 28% (17/60) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
Daniel Cox
Player
Herkko Pollanen
47%
(
28 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
72%
(
23 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Daniel Cox | Herkko Pollanen |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 67% (12/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 65% (24/13) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 56% (187/149) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 71% (10/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.39 | 0 |
Aces Total | 64 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
DFs Total | 38 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:22:14 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 81.17 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 66% (673/1019) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 73% (488/673) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (169/346) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 38% (51/134) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 42% (455/1087) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (12/18) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (11/11) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (11/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Cox Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Emile Hudd
Player
Daniel Cox
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Cox
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
74%
(
64 of
87)
1st Serve %
73%
(
74 of
101)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Cox
Player
Daniel Masur
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Masur
Player
Daniel Cox
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Henry Searle
Player
Daniel Cox
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
18 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Cox
Player
Jerome Kym
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Cox
Player
Leonardo Rossi
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Cox
Player
Andrea Guerrieri
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
0-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marvin Moeller
Player
Daniel Cox
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Cox
Player
Hynek Barton
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Herkko Pollanen Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
John Mcnally
Player
Herkko Pollanen
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Daniel Cox
Player
Herkko Pollanen
47%
(
28 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
72%
(
23 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Herkko Pollanen
Player
Vuk Budic
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Jared Hiltzik
Player
Herkko Pollanen
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
7
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Herkko Pollanen
Player
Dennis Uspensky
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Herkko Pollanen
Player
Delf Gohlke
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
George Von Massow
Player
Herkko Pollanen
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
27 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
99
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H |
view more